Is regularly detecting and locating partial discharges better than continuously monitoring partial discharges? The "better" solution depends on the particular circumstance, as both continuous PD monitoring and regular partial discharge (PD) detection and localization offer benefits and drawbacks. Here's a summary to aid in your decision: Regular detection and location: Pros: Cost-effective: Requires less expensive equipment and personnel compared to continuous monitoring. Suitable for low-risk assets: Can be sufficient for assets with low criticality or a less frequent failure history. Provides actionable insights: Enables targeted maintenance and repair efforts based on identified PD locations. Cons: Reactive approach: only detects post-disaster problems after they happen, which can cause damage and downtime. Limited data: only offers brief glimpses at PD activity, making it hard to identify patterns or anticipate new problems. able to overlook fleeting happenings Could miss transient PD activity, which could postpone discovery. Continuous PD monitoring: Pros: Proactive approach: Real-time monitoring allows early detection of PD activity, preventing failures and minimizing downtime. Comprehensive data: Provides continuous insights into PD trends and severity, enabling preventative maintenance and risk assessment. Can capture transient events: Detects short-lived PD activity, ensuring a more complete picture of the asset's health. Cons: Higher cost: increases operating expenses due to the need for more sophisticated equipment and knowledge. Data overload: This may produce a lot of data that needs to be carefully analyzed and interpreted. Possibility of false alarms: Careful alarm threshold setting is important to prevent needless maintenance activities. The optimal strategy ultimately depends on a number of variables: Criticality of the asset: Assets at high risk that could suffer major implications from downtime should be continuously monitored. Failure history: Continuous monitoring is beneficial for early detection of assets having a history of PD-related failures. Financial restraints: For applications that are cost-sensitive, routine detection may be better. Expertise availability: To analyze and understand data, continuous monitoring calls for qualified staff. Myriad Industrial Solutions LLP, a leading supplier from Dahisar, Mumbai, is a dealer and distributor of portable partial discharge detection systems , partial discharge monitoring systems designed by experienced manufacturers. Contact us to purchase the right partial discharge test system for your application. :